Expert Analysis: CS Sfaxien vs. Esperance Sportive de Tunis
The upcoming football match between CS Sfaxien and Esperance Sportive de Tunis promises to be a thrilling encounter. Both teams have a rich history in Tunisian football, making this matchup highly anticipated. With CS Sfaxien’s home advantage and Esperance’s strong offensive capabilities, the game is expected to be competitive. The betting predictions suggest a cautious approach, with a high likelihood of low-scoring halves.
CS Sfaxien
Esperance Sportive de Tunis
(FT)
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half | 98.80% | (1-2) | |
| Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half | 92.60% | (1-2) | |
| Both Teams Not to Score | 77.20% | (1-2) 1.57 | |
| Over 0.5 Goals HT | 69.20% | (1-2) 1-2 1H 1.57 | |
| Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half | 63.00% | (1-2) | |
| Away Team Not To Score In 2nd Half | 61.30% | (1-2) | |
| Home Team To Score In 1st Half | 57.30% | (1-2) | |
| Over 1.5 Goals | 62.20% | (1-2) 1.57 | |
| Home Team To Score In 2nd Half | 57.20% | (1-2) | |
| Under 2.5 Goals | 57.60% | (1-2) 1.44 | |
| Avg. Total Goals | 3.10% | (1-2) | |
| Avg. Goals Scored | 2.60% | (1-2) | |
| Avg. Conceded Goals | 1.80% | (1-2) |
Betting Predictions Overview
- Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half: 98.80%
- Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half: 92.60%
- Both Teams Not to Score: 77.20%
- Over 0.5 Goals HT: 69.20%
Detailed Predictions
- Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half: 63.00%
- Away Team Not To Score In 2nd Half: 61.30%
- Home Team To Score In 1st Half: 57.30%
- Over 1.5 Goals: 62.20%
- Home Team To Score In 2nd Half: 57.20%
- Under 2.5 Goals: 57.60%
Average Goals Analysis
- Avg. Total Goals: 3.10
- Avg. Goals Scored: 2.60
- Avg. Conceded Goals: 1.80
The data indicates that while the average total goals are projected at around three, the cautious nature of the teams could lead to fewer goals than expected, especially in the second half. The odds reflect a defensive strategy from both sides, suggesting that betting on low-scoring outcomes might be the most prudent approach.
